FreeBSD Manual Pages
dispatch_async(3) Library Functions Manual dispatch_async(3) NAME dispatch_async, dispatch_sync -- schedule blocks for execution SYNOPSIS #include <dispatch/dispatch.h> void dispatch_async(dispatch_queue_t queue, void (^block)(void)); void dispatch_sync(dispatch_queue_t queue, void (^block)(void)); void dispatch_async_f(dispatch_queue_t queue, void *context, void (*function)(void *)); void dispatch_sync_f(dispatch_queue_t queue, void *context, void (*function)(void *)); DESCRIPTION The dispatch_async() and dispatch_sync() functions schedule blocks for concurrent execution within the dispatch(3) framework. Blocks are sub- mitted to a queue which dictates the policy for their execution. See dispatch_queue_create(3) for more information about creating dispatch queues. These functions support efficient temporal synchronization, background concurrency and data-level concurrency. These same functions can also be used for efficient notification of the completion of asynchronous blocks (a.k.a. callbacks). TEMPORAL SYNCHRONIZATION Synchronization is often required when multiple threads of execution access shared data concurrently. The simplest form of synchronization is mutual-exclusion (a lock), whereby different subsystems execute con- currently until a shared critical section is entered. In the pthread(3) family of procedures, temporal synchronization is accomplished like so: int r = pthread_mutex_lock(&my_lock); assert(r == 0); // critical section r = pthread_mutex_unlock(&my_lock); assert(r == 0); The dispatch_sync() function may be used with a serial queue to accom- plish the same style of synchronization. For example: dispatch_sync(my_queue, ^{ // critical section }); In addition to providing a more concise expression of synchronization, this approach is less error prone as the critical section cannot be ac- cidentally left without restoring the queue to a reentrant state. The dispatch_async() function may be used to implement deferred criti- cal sections when the result of the block is not needed locally. De- ferred critical sections have the same synchronization properties as the above code, but are non-blocking and therefore more efficient to perform. For example: dispatch_async(my_queue, ^{ // critical section }); BACKGROUND CONCURRENCY dispatch_async() function may be used to execute trivial background tasks on a global concurrent queue. For example: dispatch_async(dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT,0), ^{ // background operation }); This approach is an efficient replacement for pthread_create(3). COMPLETION CALLBACKS Completion callbacks can be accomplished via nested calls to the dispatch_async() function. It is important to remember to retain the destination queue before the first call to dispatch_async(), and to re- lease that queue at the end of the completion callback to ensure the destination queue is not deallocated while the completion callback is pending. For example: void async_read(object_t obj, void *where, size_t bytes, dispatch_queue_t destination_queue, void (^reply_block)(ssize_t r, int err)) { // There are better ways of doing async I/O. // This is just an example of nested blocks. dispatch_retain(destination_queue); dispatch_async(obj->queue, ^{ ssize_t r = read(obj->fd, where, bytes); int err = errno; dispatch_async(destination_queue, ^{ reply_block(r, err); }); dispatch_release(destination_queue); }); } RECURSIVE LOCKS While dispatch_sync() can replace a lock, it cannot replace a recursive lock. Unlike locks, queues support both asynchronous and synchronous operations, and those operations are ordered by definition. A recursive call to dispatch_sync() causes a simple deadlock as the currently exe- cuting block waits for the next block to complete, but the next block will not start until the currently running block completes. As the dispatch framework was designed, we studied recursive locks. We found that the vast majority of recursive locks are deployed retroac- tively when ill-defined lock hierarchies are discovered. As a conse- quence, the adoption of recursive locks often mutates obvious bugs into obscure ones. This study also revealed an insight: if reentrancy is un- avoidable, then reader/writer locks are preferable to recursive locks. Disciplined use of reader/writer locks enable reentrancy only when reentrancy is safe (the "read" side of the lock). Nevertheless, if it is absolutely necessary, what follows is an imper- fect way of implementing recursive locks using the dispatch framework: void sloppy_lock(object_t object, void (^block)(void)) { if (object->owner == pthread_self()) { return block(); } dispatch_sync(object->queue, ^{ object->owner = pthread_self(); block(); object->owner = NULL; }); } The above example does not solve the case where queue A runs on thread X which calls dispatch_sync() against queue B which runs on thread Y which recursively calls dispatch_sync() against queue A, which dead- locks both examples. This is bug-for-bug compatible with nontrivial pthread usage. In fact, nontrivial reentrancy is impossible to support in recursive locks once the ultimate level of reentrancy is deployed (IPC or RPC). IMPLIED REFERENCES Synchronous functions within the dispatch framework hold an implied reference on the target queue. In other words, the synchronous function borrows the reference of the calling function (this is valid because the calling function is blocked waiting for the result of the synchro- nous function, and therefore cannot modify the reference count of the target queue until after the synchronous function has returned). For example: queue = dispatch_queue_create("com.example.queue", NULL); assert(queue); dispatch_sync(queue, ^{ do_something(); //dispatch_release(queue); // NOT SAFE -- dispatch_sync() is still using 'queue' }); dispatch_release(queue); // SAFELY balanced outside of the block provided to dispatch_sync() This is in contrast to asynchronous functions which must retain both the block and target queue for the duration of the asynchronous opera- tion (as the calling function may immediately release its interest in these objects). FUNDAMENTALS Conceptually, dispatch_sync() is a convenient wrapper around dispatch_async() with the addition of a semaphore to wait for comple- tion of the block, and a wrapper around the block to signal its comple- tion. See dispatch_semaphore_create(3) for more information about dis- patch semaphores. The actual implementation of the dispatch_sync() function may be optimized and differ from the above description. The dispatch_async() function is a wrapper around dispatch_async_f(). The application-defined context parameter is passed to the function when it is invoked on the target queue. The dispatch_sync() function is a wrapper around dispatch_sync_f(). The application-defined context parameter is passed to the function when it is invoked on the target queue. SEE ALSO dispatch(3), dispatch_apply(3), dispatch_once(3), dispatch_queue_create(3), dispatch_semaphore_create(3) Darwin May 1, 2009 dispatch_async(3)
NAME | SYNOPSIS | DESCRIPTION | TEMPORAL SYNCHRONIZATION | BACKGROUND CONCURRENCY | COMPLETION CALLBACKS | RECURSIVE LOCKS | IMPLIED REFERENCES | FUNDAMENTALS | SEE ALSO
Want to link to this manual page? Use this URL:
<https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=dispatch_async&sektion=3&manpath=FreeBSD+Ports+14.3.quarterly>