Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)

FreeBSD Manual Pages

  
 
  

home | help
PCRECOMPAT(3)		    Library Functions Manual		   PCRECOMPAT(3)

NAME
     PCRE - Perl-compatible regular expressions

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PCRE AND PERL
     This document describes the differences in the ways that PCRE and Perl han-
     dle regular expressions. The differences described here are with respect to
     Perl versions 5.10 and above.

     1.  PCRE  has  only  a subset of Perl's Unicode support. Details of what it
     does have are given in the pcreunicode page.

     2. PCRE allows repeat quantifiers only  on  parenthesized	assertions,  but
     they  do  not mean what you might think. For example, (?!a){3} does not as-
     sert that the next three characters are not "a". It just asserts  that  the
     next character is not "a" three times (in principle: PCRE optimizes this to
     run  the  assertion just once). Perl allows repeat quantifiers on other as-
     sertions such as \b, but these do not seem to have any use.

     3. Capturing subpatterns that occur inside  negative  lookahead  assertions
     are  counted,  but  their entries in the offsets vector are never set. Perl
     sometimes (but not always) sets its numerical variables from  inside  nega-
     tive assertions.

     4.  Though binary zero characters are supported in the subject string, they
     are not allowed in a pattern string because it is	passed	as  a  normal  C
     string,  terminated by zero. The escape sequence \0 can be used in the pat-
     tern to represent a binary zero.

     5. The following Perl escape sequences are not supported: \l, \u,	\L,  \U,
     and  \N when followed by a character name or Unicode value. (\N on its own,
     matching a non-newline character, is supported.) In fact these  are  imple-
     mented  by  Perl's  general string-handling and are not part of its pattern
     matching engine. If any of these are encountered by PCRE, an error is  gen-
     erated by default. However, if the PCRE_JAVASCRIPT_COMPAT option is set, \U
     and \u are interpreted as JavaScript interprets them.

     6.  The  Perl escape sequences \p, \P, and \X are supported only if PCRE is
     built with Unicode character property support. The properties that  can  be
     tested  with  \p and \P are limited to the general category properties such
     as Lu and Nd, script names such as Greek or Han, and the derived properties
     Any and L&. PCRE does support the Cs (surrogate) property, which Perl  does
     not;  the Perl documentation says "Because Perl hides the need for the user
     to understand the internal representation of Unicode characters,  there  is
     no need to implement the somewhat messy concept of surrogates."

     7.  PCRE does support the \Q...\E escape for quoting substrings. Characters
     in between are treated as literals. This is slightly different from Perl in
     that $ and @ are also handled as literals inside the quotes. In Perl,  they
     cause  variable interpolation (but of course PCRE does not have variables).
     Note the following examples:

	 Pattern	    PCRE matches      Perl matches

	 \Qabc$xyz\E	    abc$xyz	      abc followed by the
						contents of $xyz
	 \Qabc\$xyz\E	    abc\$xyz	      abc\$xyz
	 \Qabc\E\$\Qxyz\E   abc$xyz	      abc$xyz

     The \Q...\E sequence  is  recognized  both  inside  and  outside  character
     classes.

     8.  Fairly  obviously,  PCRE  does not support the (?{code}) and (??{code})
     constructions. However, there is support for recursive  patterns.	This  is
     not available in Perl 5.8, but it is in Perl 5.10. Also, the PCRE "callout"
     feature  allows  an external function to be called during pattern matching.
     See the pcrecallout documentation for details.

     9. Subpatterns that are called as subroutines (whether or not  recursively)
     are  always  treated as atomic groups in PCRE. This is like Python, but un-
     like Perl.  Captured values that are set outside a subroutine call  can  be
     reference	from inside in PCRE, but not in Perl. There is a discussion that
     explains these differences in more detail in the section on recursion  dif-
     ferences from Perl in the pcrepattern page.

     10.  If any of the backtracking control verbs are used in a subpattern that
     is called as a subroutine (whether or not	recursively),  their  effect  is
     confined to that subpattern; it does not extend to the surrounding pattern.
     This  is  not always the case in Perl. In particular, if (*THEN) is present
     in a group that is called as a subroutine, its action is  limited	to  that
     group,  even if the group does not contain any | characters. Note that such
     subpatterns are processed as anchored at the point where they are tested.

     11. If a pattern contains more than  one  backtracking  control  verb,  the
     first  one  that  is  backtracked	onto  acts.  For example, in the pattern
     A(*COMMIT)B(*PRUNE)C a failure in B triggers (*COMMIT), but a failure in  C
     triggers  (*PRUNE).  Perl's  behaviour is more complex; in many cases it is
     the same as PCRE, but there are examples where it differs.

     12. Most backtracking verbs in assertions have their normal  actions.  They
     are not confined to the assertion.

     13. There are some differences that are concerned with the settings of cap-
     tured  strings  when  part  of a pattern is repeated. For example, matching
     "aba" against the pattern /^(a(b)?)+$/ in Perl leaves $2 unset, but in PCRE
     it is set to "b".

     14. PCRE's handling of duplicate subpattern numbers and  duplicate  subpat-
     tern  names  is not as general as Perl's. This is a consequence of the fact
     the PCRE works internally just with numbers, using  an  external  table  to
     translate	between  numbers  and  names.  In  particular, a pattern such as
     (?|(?<a>A)|(?<b>B), where the two capturing parentheses have the same  num-
     ber  but  different names, is not supported, and causes an error at compile
     time. If it were allowed, it would not be	possible  to  distinguish  which
     parentheses  matched, because both names map to capturing subpattern number
     1. To avoid this confusing situation, an error is given at compile time.

     15. Perl recognizes comments in some places that PCRE does not,  for  exam-
     ple,  between  the ( and ? at the start of a subpattern. If the /x modifier
     is set, Perl allows white space between ( and ? (though current Perls  warn
     that this is deprecated) but PCRE never does, even if the PCRE_EXTENDED op-
     tion is set.

     16.  Perl,  when in warning mode, gives warnings for character classes such
     as [A-\d] or [a-[:digit:]]. It then treats the hyphens  as  literals.  PCRE
     has  no  warning features, so it gives an error in these cases because they
     are almost certainly user mistakes.

     17. In PCRE, the upper/lower case character properties Lu and  Ll	are  not
     affected  when  case-independent matching is specified. For example, \p{Lu}
     always matches an upper case letter. I think Perl has changed in  this  re-
     spect;  in  the  release  at  the time of writing (5.16), \p{Lu} and \p{Ll}
     match all letters, regardless of case, when case independence is specified.

     18. PCRE provides some extensions to the Perl  regular  expression  facili-
     ties.   Perl 5.10 includes new features that are not in earlier versions of
     Perl, some of which (such as named parentheses) have been in PCRE for  some
     time. This list is with respect to Perl 5.10:

     (a) Although lookbehind assertions in PCRE must match fixed length strings,
     each  alternative	branch	of  a lookbehind assertion can match a different
     length of string. Perl requires them all to have the same length.

     (b) If PCRE_DOLLAR_ENDONLY is set and PCRE_MULTILINE  is  not  set,  the  $
     meta-character matches only at the very end of the string.

     (c)  If PCRE_EXTRA is set, a backslash followed by a letter with no special
     meaning is faulted. Otherwise, like Perl, the backslash is quietly ignored.
     (Perl can be made to issue a warning.)

     (d) If PCRE_UNGREEDY is set, the greediness of the  repetition  quantifiers
     is  inverted, that is, by default they are not greedy, but if followed by a
     question mark they are.

     (e) PCRE_ANCHORED can be used at matching time to force  a  pattern  to  be
     tried only at the first matching position in the subject string.

     (f) The PCRE_NOTBOL, PCRE_NOTEOL, PCRE_NOTEMPTY, PCRE_NOTEMPTY_ATSTART, and
     PCRE_NO_AUTO_CAPTURE options for pcre_exec() have no Perl equivalents.

     (g)  The \R escape sequence can be restricted to match only CR, LF, or CRLF
     by the PCRE_BSR_ANYCRLF option.

     (h) The callout facility is PCRE-specific.

     (i) The partial matching facility is PCRE-specific.

     (j) Patterns compiled by PCRE can be saved and re-used  at  a  later  time,
     even  on different hosts that have the other endianness. However, this does
     not apply to optimized data created by the just-in-time compiler.

     (k) The alternative matching functions (pcre_dfa_exec(),  pcre16_dfa_exec()
     and  pcre32_dfa_exec(),) match in a different way and are not Perl-compati-
     ble.

     (l) PCRE recognizes some special sequences such as (*CR) at the start of  a
     pattern that set overall options that cannot be changed within the pattern.

AUTHOR
     Philip Hazel
     University Computing Service
     Cambridge CB2 3QH, England.

REVISION
     Last updated: 10 November 2013
     Copyright (c) 1997-2013 University of Cambridge.

PCRE 8.34			10 November 2013		   PCRECOMPAT(3)

Want to link to this manual page? Use this URL:
<https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=pcrecompat&sektion=3&manpath=FreeBSD+Ports+15.1.quarterly>

home | help